Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I’ve been looking at governance votes for several projects again. To be honest, the more I look, the more it seems like “delegated voting = convenience,” eventually leading to a few major holders or agents just nodding to pass proposals. Everyone throws their votes out for convenience, but in the end, who does the governance tokens really govern… Anyway, it’s not me, someone who holds a hardware wallet and has to triple-check the address before signing.
What’s more awkward is that the voting page links are full of “same name, different domains,” and in the chat group, people are passionately debating whether extreme fee rates are a reversal or just a continued bubble. Meanwhile, I’m thinking: Is this link really official? Has the signed content been stuffed with strange permissions? My biggest fear isn’t losing money; it’s losing control — if the money is gone, I can still accept it, but if I’ve handed over permissions and don’t even know to whom, that feeling is even more disgusting. For now, I’d rather vote slowly than casually hand over the decision-making power.