Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just been diving into the wild story of Charlotte Fang, and honestly, it's one of the most controversial yet fascinating figures in NFT culture you don't hear enough about.
So here's the thing - Charlotte Fang (formerly Krishna Okhandiar) didn't start with Milady. Before that, there was Yayo, an NFT project that basically vanished without much trace. But when he pivoted back to crypto art in August 2021 and launched Milady, something clicked. The project was simple on paper - a cartoon-like NFT series with a roadmap centered around building a Minecraft-style server. Sounds humble, right? Except the market ate it up. By April 2022, Milady's floor price hit 1.55 ETH, landing it firmly in blue-chip territory.
But then everything got messy. Turns out Charlotte Fang had been running this whole other thing called Miya - a virtual identity posting racist, homophobic, and white nationalist content. When DefiLlama's founder exposed it in May 2022, the NFT space went into shock. Milady's floor crashed to 0.26 ETH. Most people would've panicked or at least tried to explain themselves. Not Charlotte Fang. He went silent, completely indifferent to the backlash.
Eventually he did respond, framing it all as performance art - a social experiment, he claimed. Whether you buy that or not, the market apparently did. Milady recovered, and the community that stuck around became almost cult-like in their loyalty. That's where the whole "cult leader" narrative comes from, honestly.
Then May 2023 happened. Elon Musk tweeted with a Milady emoji, and suddenly the project exploded. Within three months, Milady became the second-highest floor price PFP NFT after Cryptopunks and BAYC. It was wild.
But drama wasn't done with Charlotte Fang. Internal lawsuits with team members, controversies, yet somehow he still managed to pull off a pre-sale for his CULT token that raised over 20 million dollars. The guy knows how to command attention, I'll give him that.
Now here's what gets me - is Charlotte Fang a genuine innovator who built something culturally significant, or is he just someone who's really, really good at playing with fire and surviving the burns? His tweets are basically fanatical declarations from the Milady community. Every post feels calculated to stir engagement. Whether the CULT token becomes anything meaningful or he launches his next social experiment, we're all just watching from the sidelines.
The whole saga says something interesting about NFT culture and how willing communities are to follow personalities, even controversial ones. Charlotte Fang proved that in crypto, narrative and community loyalty can overcome almost any scandal.