Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
One of the most notable pieces of news in the crypto world this week is that CryptoPunks and Chromie Squiggles have been officially permanently collected by the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York. This is undoubtedly a milestone moment in the development of NFTs—on-chain digital art has finally received official recognition from a top art institution, entering the most important cultural temple in the world.
But the problem arises. While we cheer for the "successful landing" of these two projects, another more heartbreaking reality surfaces: what about the 99.9% of digital assets? Where is the truly safe "vault" for those encryption assets that have not been selected by top museums and lack academic endorsement?
Put assets on exchanges? Always at risk of being stolen. Self-custody wallet? If you accidentally forget the mnemonic phrase, it's all over. This dilemma points to a deeper issue - Web3 users lack an asset carrying system that is both decentralized and can ensure value stability.
MoMA provides "permanence" for top-tier NFTs with its century-old heritage and physical vaults, while the stablecoin ecosystem attempts to construct a "value firewall" for broader digital assets using blockchain and encryption economics. Both paths lead to the same destination – addressing the same issue: how to ensure that digital assets truly retain value and are genuinely reliable. MoMA's solution is institutional endorsement, while the stablecoin ecosystem's solution is technical transparency. Which one aligns more with the spirit of Web3? That may depend on what you believe.
---
Isn't the MoMA collection just a story of playing people for suckers? 0.1% of the projects rise, while the remaining 99.9% we still have to keep our Wallet safe.
---
To put it simply, it's a multiple-choice question between centralization and Decentralization. I still trust technology a bit more.
---
Haha, this is the reality. While the CryptoPunks have ascended, we are still anxiously withdrawing from the exchange.
---
Stablecoin firewall? Sounds nice, but who can guarantee it? In the end, it still depends on who has the stronger backing.
---
Stop it, big institutions just want to stabilize their own coins.
MoMA is just a stamp of approval for the rich; we should rely on ourselves to hold the keys steady.
Once the mnemonic phrase is lost, it will never be lost a second time, trust me.
I see through the stablecoin trap; it’s still better to manage the Wallet privately.
Selling to MoMA? I just want to make money, who cares about eternity?
A thousand coins are not worth one coin that is collected; it ultimately comes down to luck.