Introduction: Investment Comparison of ARB vs NEAR
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Arbitrum (ARB) and Near (NEAR) has always been a topic that investors cannot avoid. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in crypto assets.
Arbitrum (ARB): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its Ethereum scaling solution that enables high-throughput, low-cost smart contracts.
Near (NEAR): Since its inception, it has been hailed as a highly scalable base protocol ensuring fast enough support for DApp operation on mobile devices.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between ARB and NEAR, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Here is the requested report in English using the provided template:
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
ARB and NEAR Historical Price Trends
- 2023: ARB launched in March and reached an all-time high of $4.00, but has since declined significantly.
- 2022: NEAR reached its all-time high of $20.44 in January, before dropping sharply in the bear market.
- Comparative analysis: In the current market cycle, ARB has fallen from its $4.00 high to a low of $0.1054, while NEAR has dropped from $20.44 to a low of $0.526762.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-16)
- ARB current price: $0.3269
- NEAR current price: $2.326
- 24-hour trading volume: $2,508,255 (ARB) vs $3,419,792 (NEAR)
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 34 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Key Factors Affecting ARB Investment Value
Supply Mechanism (Tokenomics)
- ARB: The Arbitrum DAO treasury holds 42.78% (427.8 million tokens) of the total supply, providing significant governance control and ecosystem development funds
- 📌 Historical Pattern: ARB's token distribution model impacts price dynamics through controlled releases and DAO governance decisions
Institutional Adoption & Market Applications
- Transaction Growth: ARB has shown impressive growth with a 600% increase in fee income over 30 days, reaching $2.42 million
- Market Performance: Breaking through long-term descending channel, approaching key resistance levels at $0.47-$0.50
- Ecosystem Development: Various proposals are driving growth, including management of 25 million ARB tokens to generate on-chain yields
Technical Development & Ecosystem Building
- Strong Security: Arbitrum's design includes robust fraud prevention mechanisms executed at the Ethereum base layer, where validators can challenge transaction validity
- Ecosystem Structure: Arbitrum's ecosystem consists of multiple layers including Curve Finance and Arbitrum DAO, which governs protocol upgrades and key decisions
- Technical Foundation: Arbitrum's rollup technology provides Ethereum scaling capabilities while maintaining security through multi-round validation processes
Macroeconomic Factors & Market Cycles
- Market Volatility: ARB faces high price volatility common in cryptocurrency markets, creating both opportunities and risks for long-term holders
- Ecosystem Growth: ARB's value is significantly influenced by the development of its ecosystem, with more applications and projects driving user adoption and investment
- Economic Tailwinds: Broader market dynamics affect ARB's momentum, with macroeconomic factors playing a crucial role in price movement
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: ARB vs NEAR
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- ARB: Conservative $0.28 - $0.33 | Optimistic $0.33 - $0.39
- NEAR: Conservative $1.51 - $2.33 | Optimistic $2.33 - $2.93
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- ARB may enter a growth phase, with an estimated price range of $0.26 - $0.44
- NEAR may enter a consolidation phase, with an estimated price range of $2.12 - $3.52
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- ARB: Base scenario $0.31 - $0.52 | Optimistic scenario $0.52 - $0.64
- NEAR: Base scenario $2.36 - $4.46 | Optimistic scenario $4.46 - $4.68
View detailed price predictions for ARB and NEAR
Disclaimer
ARB:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
0.39252 |
0.3271 |
0.284577 |
0 |
2026 |
0.4497625 |
0.35981 |
0.3310252 |
10 |
2027 |
0.4412170125 |
0.40478625 |
0.2550153375 |
23 |
2028 |
0.52452202275 |
0.42300163125 |
0.296101141875 |
29 |
2029 |
0.55903895586 |
0.473761827 |
0.36479660679 |
44 |
2030 |
0.6351724814589 |
0.51640039143 |
0.309840234858 |
58 |
NEAR:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
2.93328 |
2.328 |
1.5132 |
0 |
2026 |
2.8673976 |
2.63064 |
2.104512 |
13 |
2027 |
3.518744064 |
2.7490188 |
2.116744476 |
18 |
2028 |
4.41877281912 |
3.133881432 |
1.81765123056 |
34 |
2029 |
5.1358048907616 |
3.77632712556 |
2.1902697328248 |
62 |
2030 |
4.67886930856884 |
4.4560660081608 |
2.361714984325224 |
91 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: ARB vs NEAR
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- ARB: Suitable for investors focused on Ethereum scaling solutions and ecosystem growth
- NEAR: Suitable for investors interested in highly scalable base protocols and mobile DApp support
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: ARB: 30% vs NEAR: 70%
- Aggressive investors: ARB: 60% vs NEAR: 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolio
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- ARB: High volatility due to relatively recent launch and market sentiment
- NEAR: Susceptibility to broader cryptocurrency market trends
Technical Risk
- ARB: Scalability challenges, network stability during high traffic
- NEAR: Potential security vulnerabilities, decentralization concerns
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on both tokens
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- ARB advantages: Strong Ethereum scaling solution, growing ecosystem, potential for significant growth
- NEAR advantages: Established protocol, focus on mobile DApps, higher current market cap
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight bias towards NEAR for its established presence
- Experienced investors: Explore ARB for potentially higher growth, while maintaining NEAR exposure
- Institutional investors: Evaluate both for portfolio diversification, with emphasis on ARB's ecosystem development
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between ARB and NEAR?
A: ARB is an Ethereum scaling solution focused on high-throughput, low-cost smart contracts, while NEAR is a highly scalable base protocol designed for fast DApp operation on mobile devices. ARB is newer to the market and closely tied to Ethereum's ecosystem, whereas NEAR has been established longer as an independent blockchain platform.
Q2: Which token has shown better price performance recently?
A: As of 2025-10-16, NEAR is trading at a higher price ($2.326) compared to ARB ($0.3269). However, recent performance should be evaluated in the context of each token's historical highs and overall market trends.
Q3: What are the key factors driving ARB's value?
A: ARB's value is primarily driven by its role in Ethereum scaling, transaction growth (600% increase in fee income over 30 days), ecosystem development through DAO proposals, and its robust security mechanisms.
Q4: How do the long-term price predictions for ARB and NEAR compare?
A: By 2030, ARB is predicted to reach $0.31 - $0.64 in base and optimistic scenarios, while NEAR is expected to reach $2.36 - $4.68. These predictions suggest potential for growth in both tokens, with NEAR maintaining a higher absolute price.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in ARB and NEAR?
A: Both tokens face market volatility risks common to cryptocurrencies. ARB may face additional risks due to its newer status and reliance on Ethereum, while NEAR might encounter challenges related to maintaining its scalability and decentralization as it grows.
Q6: How should investors allocate their portfolio between ARB and NEAR?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to ARB and 70% to NEAR, while more aggressive investors could opt for 60% ARB and 40% NEAR. The exact allocation should be based on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q7: Which token is better suited for different types of investors?
A: New investors might prefer NEAR for its more established presence. Experienced investors could explore ARB for potentially higher growth. Institutional investors should consider both for portfolio diversification, with a particular interest in ARB's developing ecosystem.