Paradigm's head of data claims that Polymarket's trading volume is "inflated," while the community accuses Paradigm of smearing a competitor.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

BlockBeats news, December 9, Paradigm’s Head of Data @notnotstorm stated today that there is an issue of double-counting in Polymarket’s trading volume, resulting in inflated trading volume data. This statement sparked widespread criticism in the crypto community, accusing Paradigm of amplifying the controversy and interpreting Polymarket negatively due to Paradigm’s own competitive stance as an investor in Kalshi. Bankr co-founder deployer pointed out that the “double-counting” issue with trading volume stems from the data collection methods of third-party data dashboards, not from any flaw in Polymarket’s own data. He emphasized that there is no fundamental error in Polymarket’s trading volume records. Dragonfly’s Head of Data @hildobby also stated, “At least since 2024, all decent data dashboards have already accounted for this.”

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)