Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation have secured overwhelming governance approval for the UNIfication proposal, a move that fundamentally changes UNI’s role within the protocol. The vote activates protocol fees for the largest decentralized exchange in crypto and introduces large-scale UNI burns, shifting the token from a governance-only asset to one that directly accrues value from platform activity.
Near-Unanimous Vote Signals Strong Community Consensus
Over the five-day voting period, more than 125 million UNI tokens were cast in favor of the proposal, with only 742 votes opposing it. The scale of support highlights a rare level of alignment among UNI holders and underscores broad confidence in the long-term economic redesign of the protocol.
Protocol Usage Now Directly Impacts UNI Supply
Uniswap processes roughly $2 billion in daily trading volume and generates an estimated $600 million in annualized fees, according to DeFillama. Until now, those fees flowed exclusively to liquidity providers, leaving UNI disconnected from the protocol’s revenue. With UNIfication approved, a portion of fees will be routed to an onchain mechanism that burns UNI, directly linking platform usage to token supply reduction.
Retroactive Burn Removes 100 Million UNI From Circulation
As part of the transition, 100 million UNI will be burned from the treasury in a retroactive measure designed to mirror the fees that could have accumulated if protocol fees had been active since Uniswap’s launch in 2018. At current prices, the burn represents more than $590 million in value removed from circulation.
Market Responds Positively to the Governance Shift
Following the approval, UNI rose 2.5% over the past 24 hours to around $5.92. The price movement reflects growing investor optimism as Uniswap enters a new phase where token value is directly tied to protocol performance rather than governance rights alone.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
UNIfication Proposal Passes, Turning UNI Into a Value-Accruing Asset
Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation have secured overwhelming governance approval for the UNIfication proposal, a move that fundamentally changes UNI’s role within the protocol. The vote activates protocol fees for the largest decentralized exchange in crypto and introduces large-scale UNI burns, shifting the token from a governance-only asset to one that directly accrues value from platform activity.
Near-Unanimous Vote Signals Strong Community Consensus
Over the five-day voting period, more than 125 million UNI tokens were cast in favor of the proposal, with only 742 votes opposing it. The scale of support highlights a rare level of alignment among UNI holders and underscores broad confidence in the long-term economic redesign of the protocol.
Protocol Usage Now Directly Impacts UNI Supply
Uniswap processes roughly $2 billion in daily trading volume and generates an estimated $600 million in annualized fees, according to DeFillama. Until now, those fees flowed exclusively to liquidity providers, leaving UNI disconnected from the protocol’s revenue. With UNIfication approved, a portion of fees will be routed to an onchain mechanism that burns UNI, directly linking platform usage to token supply reduction.
Retroactive Burn Removes 100 Million UNI From Circulation
As part of the transition, 100 million UNI will be burned from the treasury in a retroactive measure designed to mirror the fees that could have accumulated if protocol fees had been active since Uniswap’s launch in 2018. At current prices, the burn represents more than $590 million in value removed from circulation.
Market Responds Positively to the Governance Shift
Following the approval, UNI rose 2.5% over the past 24 hours to around $5.92. The price movement reflects growing investor optimism as Uniswap enters a new phase where token value is directly tied to protocol performance rather than governance rights alone.