Crypto laundering in 2026 evolves beyond mixers, with Ethereum, stablecoins, and bridges being risky choices for illicit activities.
Crypto laundering is evolving in 2026. While many still think mixers are the safest option, that’s no longer the case.
Advanced criminals have moved beyond simple techniques, using more sophisticated methods.
Ethereum and stablecoins, once popular for laundering, now carry significant risks due to their vulnerabilities.
The Risks of Using Ethereum and Stablecoins for Laundering
Ethereum and stablecoins like USDT and USDC are not ideal for long-term crypto laundering.
These assets rely on centralized structures, allowing issuers to freeze funds at any time.
The issuers of USDT and USDC control the tokens and can halt transactions when necessary Ethereum also faces challenges, as validators can censor transactions on the network.
For laundering, assets that can be censored or frozen are dangerous.
Holding funds in Ethereum or stablecoins means the risk of having assets blocked.
This centralization exposes criminals to greater risk, making these assets unreliable for illicit activities.
The Dangers of Using Bridges in Crypto Laundering
Bridges are another risky option for laundering funds across different blockchains.
When funds move from Ethereum to Bitcoin, multisig wallets still control many bridges.
This centralized control allows operators to freeze transactions, creating major risks for large fund transfers.
This centralization undermines the privacy and security needed for illicit activities.
🚨HOW CRYPTO LAUNDERING ACTUALLY WORKS IN 2026. 🚨
There’s a lazy myth that mixers make funds untraceable. At scale, that’s false.
For groups like Lazarus Group, mixers are a liability. The real game is chain hopping.
- Don’t hold censorable assets
ETH and stablecoins are… pic.twitter.com/xFKmGKhNw9
— chrisdior.eth (@chrisdior777) January 20, 2026
Though bridges enable cross-chain transactions, they expose funds to additional risks.
Centralized control over these bridges could allow authorities to freeze assets. As a result, criminals seeking to launder large amounts of money find bridges unreliable and unsafe.
Why THORChain Is Becoming the Go-To for Launderers
THORChain stands out by offering a decentralized solution to cross-chain transactions.
Unlike traditional systems that use bridges or wrapped tokens, which rely on centralized trust, THORChain uses validators who bond $RUNE to secure vaults.
This ensures no single validator can control the network, and everyone runs their own infrastructure for added security.
A key feature of THORChain is its Validator Churning system. Every 2.5 days, nodes rotate, keeping the network dynamic and secure.
This constant change ensures funds are always spendable and prevents any validator from gaining too much control.
ELI5: What makes THORChain different? 🧠
Most cross chain solutions use bridges (trust a few people) or wrapped tokens (trust a company).
THORChain’s unique innovations:
🔐 Capped Proof of Bond Validators bond $RUNE to secure vaults. No single validator can dominate. No… pic.twitter.com/dpnV3XK8L9
— THORChain (@THORChain) January 20, 2026
The Bifrost Protocol allows THORChain to connect to multiple chain types, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cosmos.
This eliminates the need for custom bridges, enabling seamless, native asset swaps like $BTC to $ETH.
The protocol ensures secure, fair transactions based on real usage, offering a decentralized solution for cross-chain interoperability.
Off-Chain Sales: The Final Step in the Laundering Process
After converting funds to Bitcoin, criminals often take the next step by exiting off-chain.
They typically use over-the-counter (OTC) desks in regions such as Southeast Asia or China.
These desks enable the sale of large Bitcoin amounts without attracting attention, keeping transactions discreet and difficult to trace.
This final step makes it harder for authorities to track the funds.
However, using OTC desks comes with a cost. To account for the risks, the illicit funds are often sold at a 15-20% discount.
This price spread is a result of the risks involved in selling Bitcoin through less transparent channels.
Despite this, it allows criminals to complete the laundering process while maintaining secrecy.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Major CEX and DEX funding rates fully turned negative, BTC down 1.93%, ETH down 2.18%
On March 22, Bitcoin reported $69,275.33, down 1.93% in 24 hours; Ethereum reported $2,103.95, down 2.18%. The market is broadly bearish, with shorts dominating. Funding rates are universally negative, indicating that shorts need to pay fees to longs.
GateNews9m ago
Erik Voorhees associated address increased holdings by 2491 ETH within 2 hours, valued at $5.32 million
Gate News reported that on March 22, according to monitoring by on-chain analyst Ai Yi, an address associated with Erik Voorhees, founder of ShapeShift and an early Bitcoin supporter, purchased 2491.44 ETH on-chain at an average price of $2134 in the past 2 hours, valued at $5.32 million. Since March 10, the address has cumulatively purchased 120,305.4 ETH with a total value of $259 million at an average cost of $2159.71.
GateNews35m ago
# Accumulated Long 120,000 ETH Whale Turns from Profit to Loss, Deposits 5 Million USDC Margin Possibly to Avoid Liquidation
According to on-chain analysts' monitoring, a whale address has accumulated holdings of 120,000 ETH and 700 BTC, valued at $298 million. Currently, the ETH position shows an unrealized loss of $309,000, while the BTC position shows an unrealized gain of $403,000. The address just deposited 5 million USDC to Hyperliquid to avoid liquidation.
GateNews39m ago
ENS domain defi.eth traded at 15 ETH, down 62.5% from its 2022 transaction price
According to OpenSea data, the ENS domain defi.eth was sold on March 22 for 15 ETH (approximately $32,337.55), which is about 62.5% lower than the 40 ETH it sold for in February 2022. The buyer's address is 0x5716...0fdd.
GateNews51m ago
US CFTC Releases Crypto Asset Collateral Pilot Guidance: BTC/ETH Capital Adequacy Ratio 20%, Stablecoins 2%
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has released guidance on a pilot program for crypto assets as collateral, allowing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins to be used as margin. Futures brokers must comply with capital requirements and regulatory reporting obligations, and after three months can expand to other crypto assets as collateral. The guidance clarifies the use cases for crypto assets and derivatives clearing requirements.
GateNews1h ago
Venus Attacker Converts BNB and Other Assets to ETH, Invested $9.92 Million Only Recovered $5 Million
On March 22, on-chain analyst Remainder monitored that the Venus attacker converted all previously extracted BNB, BTC, and CAKE into ETH and bridged it to the Ethereum network, valued at approximately $4.72 million. Currently, the attacker has recovered assets worth approximately $5 million, but whether they conducted long/short operations on trading platforms remains unconfirmed.
GateNews1h ago
