Originally written by Alex Xu, Research Partner, Mint Ventures
The content of this article is the author’s observation of the new trend of the rollup market, the future development, and the deduction of possible opportunities. Try to discuss the following topics:
The following article is the author’s interim view as of the time of publication, and is more deduced and explained from a business perspective, and less ink on the technical details of Rollup. This article may contain errors and biases in facts and opinions, and is for discussion purposes only, and we look forward to corrections from other investment research peers.
Similar to the Defi Summer at the beginning of 2020 and the inscription Summer in 23 years, **Rollup Summer is the author’s definition of the state of the explosion of new Rollup projects that may occur in the future in multiple dimensions such as quantity, business volume (TVL, active users, ecological projects). **
Rollup Summer is manifested in:
Rollup Summer may start at the end of '23 or the beginning of '24, and may become an important narrative throughout the six months or even the whole year.
And the main factors for incubating a Rollup Summer are:
Rollups themselves are not a new species, and the rollups that have been launched including Arbitrum and Optimism already have a huge Market Cap and business volume, and other ZKRollups such as Starknet and zkSync have been running for a long time.
But the protagonists of this round of Rollup Summer will be the new rollup projects that have just appeared in this cycle, because:
**To put it simply, the characteristics of this round of new rollup are: the project is new, there are tokens, modularity, and generous incentives, so that the initial business of the project and the flywheel of the currency price will rotate faster. **
The initial stage of Rollup Summer’s flywheel may come from: TokenAirdrop plans to → introduce user assets, increase the core business data, i.e., TVL→ projects Market Cap grow.
The second phase may come from: Token ecological Airdrop plan→ directly subsidizing dapps in the ecosystem, indirectly subsidizing users→ further introducing user assets, increasing core data TVL + number of active users + gas fees→ projects Market Cap further expanding → new Rollup flip The call for the old generation of Rollup → further market sentiment Fomo.
In addition to the flywheel effect of the emerging rollups, another background factor is the expected Ethereum Cancun upgrade in February this year, which itself directly Favourable Information Arbitrum and Optimism, which is reflected in the rapid drop of their L1 costs and the formation of larger Layer 2 profit margins. But Cancun itself will also attract the attention of the entire market to the rollup track, bringing attention and money to the new rollups.
The author takes two Rollups that have attracted a lot of attention recently as examples, and analyzes the operation mode and characteristics of the protagonist of Rollup Summer, the new Rollup.
Website:
The main features of ZKFair as a rollup are:
ZKFair attracted more than 110 million funds to participate in the campaign, image source: airdrop
Since ZKF is distributed based on the ratio of the total gas consumption of participants to the total gas amount during the event, this means that the sale of ZKF is a game of “fighting for money”, and a large number of users will USDC Cross-Chain Interaction to ZKFair Mainnet for the event. During the Airdrop event, ZKFair’s on-chain funds soared from 0 to a maximum of about $140 million in 2 or 3 days, which was comparable to Starknet, the head project of ZKRollup at that time. Even at the current stage where the Airdrop has ended, ZKFair’s TVL of 70 million $+ is higher than the earlier ZKRollup project Scroll.
The benefits of ZKFair’s above operation are clear:
At present, ZKF’s FDV is about 100 million, and as far as one rollup is concerned, its Market Cap is still not high compared to the horizontal valuation of other Rollups.
Website:
The features of Manta Rollup are:
Manta’s Rollup was officially launched in September '23, but the take-off of business data was after the launch of the new paradigm campaign in mid-December, and the total amount of on-chain funds (official data) is now close to 750 million.
The chart below shows Manta’s on-chain Defi TVL trend, and we can see that the obvious growth inflection point is after the launch of new paradigm.
Manta’s investment lineup is also very luxurious, with a valuation of $500 million in the last round of funding:
Image Credits:
The activity logic of New paradigm is very simple, it is an upgrade of blur’s blast mode:
New paradigm will distribute a total of 45 million Manta Token to Non-fungible Token holders, accounting for 4.5% of the total, and the author roughly estimates that the FDV valuation of the project after the launch of Manta Token is in the range of $1.5-2.5 billion based on today’s Non-fungible Token Secondary Market(24.1.5) data.
In addition to ZKFair and Manta, other similar new rollups are also emerging, such as the earlier Blast, and the recent Layer X, which mixes ZKFair and Manta models.
In addition, considering that ZKRollup projects such as Scroll and zkSync have not yet issued coins, these projects that were launched earlier on the Mainnet also have the opportunity to refer to the model of ZKFair and Manta to directly attract users and funds for their own ecology through a clearer Token reward mechanism.
Next, we can deduce the possible development path of Rollup Summer:
We can see from this that the biggest challenge for the new rollups and Rollup Summer after their initial success lies in how to incentivize the sustainable development of the ecosystem after the initial distribution of tokens, and how to make their Rollup ecosystem emerge applications and services that can retain users and funds and have a wealth effect, whether it is Meme, Defi or more Airdrops and ingenious Ponzi.
Which secondary targets will benefit from the development of Rollup Summer? From Rollup Summer, the following sub-narratives may be derived:
ZKFair and Manta, as well as many more new rollups, will feature Celestia’s DA offerings, and Celestia is moving from story to example. Once the example project using Celestia has good market feedback, more new rollups will inevitably follow suit. “Using Celestia as the DA layer” may become the standard configuration of the new Rollup, and Celestia will become the new Consensus layer of Rollups, and then become the core infrastructure of the Rollup era.
From this, there may be a sub-narrative of “Celestia is Ethereum in the Rollup era”, and whether this story can come true in the future is not important in the short term, because from Celestia’s current circulating Market Cap of only 2.3 billion $, it is two orders of magnitude away from Ethereum’s circulating Market Cap of 270 billion $.
Source:
The replacement process of interest-bearing assets, especially interest-bearing stable coins such as sDAI, for mainstream stable coins has been relatively slow in the past, but in the Airdrop activities of Blast and Manta, ETH interest-bearing assets and interest-bearing stable coins have almost become the native assets of this new type of Rollup, and if more Rollups follow up with such practices, it will directly promote the expansion of user groups and the formation of habits. This is directly favourable information for interest-bearing asset issuers that have access to strong rollup partnerships, such as Blast for Lido and MakerDao, and Manta for Stakestone and Mountain Protocol.
In terms of experience, there is no substantial difference between Rollup and L1, and the L1 public chain tide of the previous cycle may reappear in the form of a sovereign rollup tide in this cycle, and Rollups will compete with each other while directly competing with L1 for users and funds. At the same time, there are also opportunities to pay attention to the native dapps on some fast-growing Rollups, such as LayerBank, a lending project on Manta, whose total deposit size has exceeded $300 million, which is close to the data of Radiant, the leading lending project on Arbitrum.
However, while we are optimistic about the rapid development of many rollups, it is also important to consider the risk of narrative failure.
The core challenge of the new rollup is a smooth transition from startup to growth. It is relatively simple to incentivize the inflow of funds with TokenAirdrop, but the challenge of incentives is more complex if you want to keep users and funds for a long time. In fact, various L1s in the previous cycle also had similar attempts, such as launching hundreds of millions of public chain incentive funds to encourage the head Defi on Ethereum to migrate, while Defi transferred the incentives to their users to improve their business data, such measures achieved good results in the early stage, but with the introduction of similar policies in each public chain, the effect of incentives gradually declined in the competition.
And even the current old rollups, such as Arbitrum and Optimism, have been issuing their own token subsidies to ecological projects, and then transferring them to users through ecological projects, hoping to retain users’ activity and funds. Arbitrum’s latest round of total incentives exceeded 70 million ARB (currently worth more than $140 million).
Therefore, we still need to see how Rollup Summer will develop as an embryonic narrative in the future, and we still need to see what happens next for the new rollup.