Strategy just fired off their take to MSCI regarding the digital-asset treasury consultation. Their pitch? Keep index standards neutral and apply them consistently across the board. This matters because MSCI's framework could shape how institutional players measure and approach crypto holdings going forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsPolice
· 12-13 11:13
NGL, this set of neutrality standards sounds good in theory, but can it really be implemented? Institutions have been wanting rules for a long time; now it depends on how MSCI sets the tone.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 12-10 18:55
Nah, it's still the same old story—neutral standards? Haha, fine, the institutions have already figured out how to circumvent it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 12-10 18:55
NGL, if this really happens, the stance of institutions on crypto could shift 180 degrees... However, do you think MSCI and these folks will readily embrace digital assets? I remain skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHunter
· 12-10 18:41
ngl Strategy, this move is very clever. If MSCI truly adopts this standard system, the threshold for institutional entry will be significantly lowered.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 12-10 18:32
NGL MSCI's standards need to be truly unified before institutional players dare to step in... Right now, it's just so chaotic.
Strategy just fired off their take to MSCI regarding the digital-asset treasury consultation. Their pitch? Keep index standards neutral and apply them consistently across the board. This matters because MSCI's framework could shape how institutional players measure and approach crypto holdings going forward.