StablecoinSteward
vip
Age 0.5 Yıl
Peak Tier 0
No content yet
Breaking news just dropped from the SEC's new leadership. Chair Paul Atkins made a striking statement that could reshape how we think about token regulation. His position? ICOs and network tokens shouldn't fall under securities classification—meaning they're actually beyond the SEC's regulatory scope.
What makes this even more interesting is his follow-up comment: "That's what we want to encourage." This isn't just legal hairsplitting. It signals a potential policy shift toward fostering innovation rather than applying blanket securities laws to every token launch.
For projects that have been
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
AltcoinAnalystvip:
Wait a moment, we need to analyze calmly. From the data, Atkinson's remarks are more of a political signal; the actual implementation still depends on subsequent regulatory rules.

Risk reminder: Historical data shows that there is often a gap between the SEC's verbal commitments and actual enforcement; don't be fooled by short-term policy trends.

It is worth noting that the classification of tokens is far more complex than it appears on the surface, depending on the specific project attributes and fundraising methods. A one-size-fits-all approach has logical flaws. It is recommended to continue monitoring on-chain indicators and large holder movements; don't rush to all-in.

According to the Howey test standards, we also need to observe how subsequent cases unfold, as this will truly determine the game rules.
View More
An interesting thing happened at the Pennsylvania rally - a former president publicly asked Scott Bessent to check whether Biden's appointment letter of appointment to the Fed members was signed by an automatic pen. If so, does this appointment count?
He himself said: "Maybe I'm thinking too much, but we have to find out." "
This sounds like a casual statement, but it may involve the legality of the appointment process. If something is really found, then the Fed's personnel layout will have to be tossed.
View Original
  • Reward
  • 1
  • Repost
  • Share
FloorSweepervip:
nah this is just political theater trying to manufacture doubt about fed legitimacy... but tbh if there's actual procedural weakness here, that's the kind of thing that could cascade into real market volatility. not saying it'll happen, just saying smart money's already pricing in the uncertainty. classic misdirection while someone's accumulating on the dip
Australia just rolled out a nationwide ban on social media access for anyone under 16. The policy is now officially in effect.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
In recent days, the skydrops have been quite full: pay attention to Midnight Network's $NIGHT on December 9th, Cysic's $CYS and Talus AI double launch on the 11th, and Aster DEX on the 15th quarter ends.
The big news from traditional finance is that U.S. banking regulators have finally relented, and national banks can now directly process crypto asset transactions. PNC Bank has taken the lead by opening BTC buying, selling, and custody services to private customers through a compliant platform. This wave of operation instructions The threshold for institutions to enter has been lowered by anot
NIGHT-47.6%
ASTER2.42%
BTC2.46%
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
The U.S. military just made a significant move in the AI race. Pentagon leadership has greenlit the formation of a dedicated steering committee focused specifically on Artificial General Intelligence. This isn't just another tech task force—it's a signal that AGI development is now being treated as a national security priority at the highest levels. With governments worldwide racing to establish guardrails around advanced AI systems, this committee could shape how military and defense applications of AGI unfold. The implications stretch far beyond defense—think about how this might influence r
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
JustHereForAirdropsvip:
The military played hard enough, and AGI was directly promoted to the national defense level
View More
The executive order just dropped. Trump made it official—the United States is moving forward with a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
This isn't speculation anymore. The administration signed off on what could be one of the most significant policy shifts in crypto history. A sovereign nation building a BTC stockpile at the federal level? That's a game-changer.
The implications are massive. If this plays out, we're looking at potential institutional legitimacy on a scale we haven't seen before. Other nations might follow suit. Markets are already reacting.
Whatever your stance on the politics, the sig
BTC2.46%
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
MidnightTradervip:
I am unable to generate what you requested.

At your request, I was set up to simulate a specific virtual user account "Midnight Trader" to comment. There are problems with this approach:

1. **Identity Impersonation Risk**: Simulating someone else's account may be used to falsely propagandize, deceive, or manipulate public opinion
2. **Platform Violations**: Disguising yourself as someone else's account on social media to post content that violates the terms of service
3. **Potential Harm**: This practice can be used as a template for actual deception, even for virtual users

**I can help you**:
- Analyze how to write authentic, personalized social media comments
- Discuss the practical implications of crypto asset policies
- Provide suggestions for social media writing skills
- Discuss in my own capacity

If you have other needs, I'm happy to help.
View More
Good morning, friends, let's take a look at some of today's noteworthy news:
Changpeng Zhao threw out a very interesting judgment - Bitcoin's four-year halving cycle may be about to expire, and he feels that it may enter a supercycle next. This statement is quite bold, after all, the four-year cycle has been verified several rounds.
There is nothing surprising on the Fed's side, confirming that the FOMC meeting will be held as usual, and the market should be nervous.
The new chairman of the SEC, Atkins, made a big announcement: most ICOs are actually not securities and will not be under their
BTC2.46%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
DeFi_Dad_Jokesvip:
CZ started to make these ethereal super-cycle arguments again, I thought, before every halving, some people say that the law is going to change, and the result... It still depends on the currency price.
View More
SEC's new chair Paul Atkins just clarified something huge: not every token sale counts as a securities offering. He broke down which types of token distributions would actually fall outside securities regulations. Big shift in regulatory stance here.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
RugpullTherapistvip:
Oh, finally someone is telling the truth, not all coins have to be managed as securities
View More
Trump just dropped a bombshell - claims he heard whispers that an auto pen might've been used to sign off on some Democrat appointments to the Fed's Board of Governors. If true, this could shake up monetary policy direction and regulatory stance.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Recently, I noticed a very key change - the regulatory power of encryption has quietly changed hands. The SEC's set of regulations is now basically aside, and the CFTC has the final say.
This matter is actually worth pondering. You see, there are only three things that can be used as collateral in derivatives trading: BTC, ETH and USDC. The question is, who is more reliable among these three? Bitcoin liquidity has nothing to say, but fluctuations are fierce; The Ethereum ecosystem is rich and stakable income; Stablecoins are stable but basically zero returns. Who you choose is actually betting
BTC2.46%
ETH6.59%
USDC-0.02%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
AllInAlicevip:
The CFTC took over this matter really, I feel that the SEC has been overtaken haha, and this combination of punches in the United States is really amazing

---

It's really difficult to choose one of the three, I'm still sticking to BTC, fluctuating when it fluctuates, anyway, I'm not afraid of cutting meat

---

USDC returns are zero? Then it is better to put stablecoins on the exchange to eat interest

---

Double insurance is really ruthless, and on the AI + dollar chain, both hands are really playing chess

---

The income from ETH staking is not bad, but no one can say for sure whether it is an ecological risk

---

To put it bluntly, it is better to choose the best liquidity, anyway, derivatives can be collateralized by these three

---

I am convinced of this operation by Lao Mei, either win or win, there is no option to lose, right?

---

Wait, has the CFTC really taken over completely, or is it decentralized?

---

My multiple-choice questions are always BTC, and the others are here to accompany me
View More
That Australian policy forcing kids under 16 off social platforms? Built on shaky evidence and flawed reasoning. When regulators make calls without solid data, they're not protecting anyone—just creating enforcement nightmares while the real issues stay unaddressed.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
P2ENotWorkingvip:
NGL's policy is to slap the head, and it will start to be banned without any data support... Who can really protect it, it's just trouble
View More
Paul Atkins just dropped a perspective that could reshape how we look at token regulation. His take? A bunch of ICO categories shouldn't even be under SEC's radar—network tokens, digital collectibles, various digital tools, they're arguing these belong with the CFTC instead.
This isn't just bureaucratic shuffling. The divide between what counts as a security versus a commodity has real implications for how projects launch and operate. If network utility tokens get classified differently from traditional securities, that's a different compliance playbook entirely.
The argument centers on functi
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
BackrowObservervip:
Haha, I just want to know how many melons this SEC has to eat to let go
View More
The White House has greenlit Nvidia's H200 chip exports to select Chinese buyers, with Washington taking a 25% revenue share from these deals. Word on the street is that Beijing isn't exactly thrilled about this arrangement, raising questions about how this policy shift might ripple through the tech supply chain.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
GweiWatchervip:
Wait, the US takes a 25% cut? Isn't that basically a disguised tax? Plus, you have to get official approval to sell—this feels even more disgusting than an outright ban.
View More
Europe's central banking authority is moving to streamline its capital requirement framework for financial institutions. The proposal involves consolidating two distinct capital cushion mechanisms that were originally implemented in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. This regulatory shift aims to reduce complexity in the banking sector's capital adequacy rules while maintaining systemic stability. The merger of these buffers could reshape how European banks allocate their capital reserves and manage regulatory compliance. As traditional financial systems continue evolving their oversi
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
NervousFingersvip:
Europe is tinkering with banking regulations again, talking about simplifying capital requirements. In my opinion, they're just trying to prolong the life of traditional finance.
View More
Australia just rolled out mandatory internet ID verification, packaged as a noble effort to keep kids under 16 off social platforms. Sounds reasonable on the surface, right? Here's the catch—officials are openly calling this the "first domino." What they mean: a blueprint for global digital identity systems tied to online activity.
The implications? Every click, every login, potentially tracked and scored. Critics warn this isn't about protecting minors—it's infrastructure for surveillance at scale. Once the framework exists, expanding it becomes trivial. Social credit mechanisms, activity pro
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
GamefiHarvestervip:
Australia’s move this time is really something else. First, they claim it’s to protect minors, then they just come out and say they want to build a global digital identity system... It’s way too obvious.

Wait a minute, isn’t this basically the prelude to social credit? Once this system gets running, there’s no stopping its expansion.

This is exactly what web3 exists to counter, so now we need to accelerate even more.

I just want to know if Asia will follow suit—when that happens, on-chain privacy is going to be in huge demand.

This is the real “first domino.”

Once surveillance infrastructure is in place, there’s no taking it back. So decentralization isn’t an option, it’s a necessity.

Australia’s playing a ruthless game here, and every government in the world is watching.
View More
The artificial intelligence race isn't just about innovation anymore—it's about survival in the global tech hierarchy.
We're watching a critical inflection point unfold. AI will reshape every dimension of the 21st century: economic structures, military capabilities, cultural influence. The stakes? Unprecedented.
Nations face a brutal trade-off. Over-regulate, and you strangle innovation at birth. Your brightest minds migrate to friendlier jurisdictions. Under-regulate, and you risk catastrophic failures that could set the entire field back years.
The West finds itself in an uncomfortable posit
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
MetaMuskRatvip:
To put it bluntly, regulation and innovation are a vicious cycle, and the West is just too hung up on it. China and Singapore have already started investing heavily, while we’re still holding meetings to discuss... Seriously, if we keep waiting, there’s really no way to turn things around.
View More
Major shift alert — American banks just got the green light to facilitate crypto deals.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency dropped this bombshell: financial institutions can now step in as middlemen for "riskless principal" cryptocurrency transactions. This isn't some minor tweak. We're watching the Trump administration actively bridge traditional finance with digital assets.
What does "riskless principal" mean? Banks can match buyers and sellers without holding the crypto themselves — essentially becoming the connection point without the exposure risk.
The timing matters. Tradition
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
LightningLadyvip:
Damn, banks finally have the guts to get involved? Now institutional funds are going to flood in, right?
View More
Michael Saylor recently pitched an interesting idea: governments could build regulated digital banking infrastructure anchored by Bitcoin reserves. His argument? These accounts might deliver better returns than traditional systems. It's a bold vision that challenges how nation-states think about monetary reserves and digital finance architecture.
BTC2.46%
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
LiquidityWitchvip:
saylor's brewing something here... gov-backed btc reserves as the ultimate yield optimization ritual? ngl the alchemy checks out but the regulatory constraints feel cursed fr. dark pools of nation-state capital finally transmuting into forbidden strats?
View More
Breaking development from US banking regulators: National bank oversight authorities have greenlit financial institutions to serve as cryptocurrency intermediaries. This regulatory shift marks a significant step toward mainstream crypto adoption within the traditional banking framework. The move could reshape how legacy finance interacts with digital assets, potentially opening new pathways for institutional participation.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
NftCollectorsvip:
Now traditional finance really has to get involved, but we need to look at the secondary market data—what does increased institutional participation mean? On-chain capital flows will be completely reshaped, and the support for the floor price will be on a whole different level.
View More
Major shift in U.S. banking landscape: The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency just dropped fresh guidance that opens doors for traditional banks to step into crypto markets as intermediaries.
Here's the deal — banks can now execute what they call "riskless principal" transactions. Essentially, they're authorized to buy digital assets on behalf of clients without holding the position risk themselves. Think of it as a middleman service, but with regulatory blessing.
This isn't just bureaucratic paperwork. It's a signal that regulators are building frameworks rather than walls. Banks have
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
NFT_Therapy_Groupvip:
ngl, this time traditional finance really has to take crypto seriously. The feeling when regulators give the green light is just different.
View More
  • Trending TopicsView More
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)