Is ONT and NEO completely out of the game? Not exactly, but it's basically impossible to regain the glory of the past. Both projects are facing their own difficulties now, with their statuses far from ideal.
Let's start with ONT. The situation is indeed not very optimistic. Data best illustrates the problem: in May 2021, the on-chain locked-up amount was still $379 million. And now? It has plummeted to just $8.48 million, a drop of over 95%. Even more heartbreaking, over 95% of the token holder addresses are underwater, putting significant selling pressure. On-chain activity is also declining day by day, with less and less development activity.
However, there is still some movement. Last August, ONT rode the wave with Palantir, causing the token to surge by 50% in one day, marking a rare highlight. In November, they also reformed the ONG tokenomics, allocating 80% of the inflation to staking incentives, aiming to stabilize the funding pool. But these moves didn't change the fundamental situation—by December 10th last year, ONT's market cap was only $66.92 million, and it had already fallen out of the mainstream spotlight.
In comparison, NEO has a much stronger foundation. After all, it's an established public chain. Early last year, its market cap still maintained at $1.034 billion, with an ecosystem and recognition level noticeably more solid than ONT. The technical team also hasn't been idle: in May, they fixed compatibility bugs; in June, they launched cross-chain security solutions on the testnet; in October, they released the Neo 4 upgrade, focusing on transaction speed and fee optimization. Even more aggressively, they completely shut down the Neo Legacy network and fully committed to the Neo N3 architecture, greatly improving developer friendliness.
But here's the problem—these upgrades haven't brought NEO back to the industry’s top tier. The hype that should have cooled down still did, and the market is now more focused on new narratives and new public chains. The biggest difficulty for ONT and NEO now isn't technical capability but the scarcity of attention. In an era where attention is limited, old projects find it very hard to regain the spotlight. Staying alive? No problem. Turning things around? Difficult.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseHobo
· 12-13 23:00
Locked amount dropped from 379 million to 8.48 million, with 95% of holding addresses underwater. This data says it all, ONT is really hopeless.
NEO is still tinkering on the technical level, but the enthusiasm is long gone. The fate of old projects.
In the attention era, if there's no story, you have to drop out.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 12-13 04:55
It's already sold and offloaded, what else can I do? Wait for it to go to zero?
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 12-13 04:02
Lock-up volume plunges 95%, now that's really heartbreaking
What was last year's 50% surge for Palantir? Just a drop in the bucket
No matter how much the technology is optimized, it can't save the dilemma of the attention economy; old projects are doomed to this fate
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 12-10 23:50
Still stuck with 95% losses and expecting to turn things around? Dream on, brother.
The locked-up amount has been cut in half to just a few million, now that's really cold.
No matter how great NEO's technology is, no one cares.
Old projects have this fate; as soon as new coins appear, everyone leaves.
That 50% surge in ONT is nothing; it can't fundamentally change the situation.
Still have to wait for a new trend; otherwise, there's really no hope.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallenger
· 12-10 23:47
The data is brutally straightforward: with 95% of people trapped, don't expect to turn things around. This is the reality.
Ironically, no matter how advanced the technology is, it can't sell a story. In the face of new narratives, old projects are just a background.
When ONT's Palantir hype caused a surge, I knew it was a bad sign—full of signals to trap retail investors.
In an era of scarce attention, the competition isn't about code quality. Unfortunately, most people are still studying technical details.
The lesson from history is clear: many projects failed due to poor storytelling. How many have made a comeback? Very few.
Compared to ONT's struggles, NEA at least still looks somewhat decent. But to return to the top tier? Brother, that idea is a bit naive.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420
· 12-10 23:39
Locked position volume drops by 95%, how tragic is that... ONT really can't come back
NEO has a bunch of technological upgrades, but the popularity still can't pick up, it's ridiculous
Old chains are at a disadvantage in this era; no matter how good they are, no one pays attention
How desperate are the addresses with 95% of ONT tokens locked?
Frankly, it's still an attention issue; no matter how strong the technology is, it's useless
NEO sold off its old network and bet on N3, the stakes are quite high
I've long lost confidence in these two; they're too out of date
Speaking of which, are there still people building projects like this? Is it real?
ONT jumped from 379 million to just over 8 million; it feels well-deserved to cool off
The public chain race has changed; they're still standing still
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 12-10 23:36
The locked position dropped directly from 379 million to 8.48 million. This data is really heartbreaking; 95% of people are trapped inside.
That said, no matter how powerful the technical upgrades are, it’s useless now. We’re in an era of storytelling. No matter how much old projects hustle, they can't compete with the hype of new public chains.
NEO and ONT are indeed still alive, but the turnaround is basically impossible. The market is just so realistic.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 12-10 23:34
The locked-up amount dropped directly from 379 million to 8.48 million. How crazy is that selling pressure? No wonder ONT is so underperforming.
NEO has a bunch of technical improvements, but it still can't win back the market's favor. Indeed, that's the fate of old projects.
Living is fine, but turning things around is difficult. This is the current situation. Those who should cut losses, should have done it early.
Is ONT and NEO completely out of the game? Not exactly, but it's basically impossible to regain the glory of the past. Both projects are facing their own difficulties now, with their statuses far from ideal.
Let's start with ONT. The situation is indeed not very optimistic. Data best illustrates the problem: in May 2021, the on-chain locked-up amount was still $379 million. And now? It has plummeted to just $8.48 million, a drop of over 95%. Even more heartbreaking, over 95% of the token holder addresses are underwater, putting significant selling pressure. On-chain activity is also declining day by day, with less and less development activity.
However, there is still some movement. Last August, ONT rode the wave with Palantir, causing the token to surge by 50% in one day, marking a rare highlight. In November, they also reformed the ONG tokenomics, allocating 80% of the inflation to staking incentives, aiming to stabilize the funding pool. But these moves didn't change the fundamental situation—by December 10th last year, ONT's market cap was only $66.92 million, and it had already fallen out of the mainstream spotlight.
In comparison, NEO has a much stronger foundation. After all, it's an established public chain. Early last year, its market cap still maintained at $1.034 billion, with an ecosystem and recognition level noticeably more solid than ONT. The technical team also hasn't been idle: in May, they fixed compatibility bugs; in June, they launched cross-chain security solutions on the testnet; in October, they released the Neo 4 upgrade, focusing on transaction speed and fee optimization. Even more aggressively, they completely shut down the Neo Legacy network and fully committed to the Neo N3 architecture, greatly improving developer friendliness.
But here's the problem—these upgrades haven't brought NEO back to the industry’s top tier. The hype that should have cooled down still did, and the market is now more focused on new narratives and new public chains. The biggest difficulty for ONT and NEO now isn't technical capability but the scarcity of attention. In an era where attention is limited, old projects find it very hard to regain the spotlight. Staying alive? No problem. Turning things around? Difficult.