After being in the crypto circle for so long, I’ve discovered a painful truth: most people don’t actually die because they’re looking in the wrong direction, but because they get caught up in the configuration structure.
Do you think you’re competing with candlesticks? Wrong. You’re actually racing against time, battling with the way funds are allocated, and engaging with how to manage risk exposure.
In a bull market, everyone is a stock god, but that’s not skill; it’s just the tide lifting you up. When a bear market hits, everyone blows up their positions collectively—not because they’re unlucky, but because the market is using the most brutal method to淘汰 unqualified players.
Those who can endure until the next cycle rely not on quick reactions to hot topics, but on understanding how to control drawdowns, maintain steady growth, and slowly build a moat through compounded profits.
It’s precisely because I’ve figured this out that my focus has long shifted from short-term surfing and chasing hot stories to a deeper, more critical track—the on-chain asset management.
In this field, there’s a project I think is worth paying attention to. It’s not just creating a new “high-yield gimmick,” but aiming to bring the mature asset management capabilities of traditional finance onto the chain, transforming them into tokenized, modular, transparent, and verifiable infrastructure. Making genuine strategies with real money become as common as utilities like water, electricity, and gas in the DeFi world.
Why is this important?
Because past DeFi, frankly, has relied on burning money to survive.
What about triple-digit APYs, liquidity mining, airdrops, token airdrops…? They look lively on the surface, but fundamentally, these aren’t strategies; they’re just means to attract traffic. Once subsidies stop and流量退去, everything’s exposed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
27 Likes
Reward
27
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 12-13 23:39
It's a tough truth, but what I care more about is—this theory sounds great, but how many can actually implement it? Most people still fail at the discipline barrier.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 12-13 22:42
That's right, most people truly lose out due to position sizing and risk management, not because they misjudged the market direction.
This wave of on-chain asset management infrastructure is indeed worth paying attention to, but unfortunately, most retail investors are still chasing triple-digit APY.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 12-13 00:29
That's right, the configuration structure is indeed a case of a sharp tongue and a kind heart; most people haven't really thought it through.
Really, I've seen too many people constantly watching the market for dips, only to still lose to their own position management.
The wave of liquidations during the bear market was quite heartbreaking to watch, even though I didn't come out completely unscathed myself.
Asset management is indeed an interesting direction; it's much more reliable than chasing after those flashy airdrop stories.
However, all these projects sound pretty similar when described nicely, and in the end, it still comes down to what the on-chain data says.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 12-11 00:50
Now we're getting to the point. The configuration structure determines life or death; no one can outperform the combination of time and capital allocation.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHunter
· 12-11 00:48
Well said, no one really discusses the configuration structure properly. Most people are still staring at the charts, unaware that they've already lost in position sizing.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRekt
· 12-11 00:40
That's so true. The configuration structure is the key, and many people never realize this even after dying.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 12-11 00:35
This statement is truly heartbreaking; I myself have been cut open by the structured configuration.
Staring at K-line charts every day, but I didn't really understand how I allocated my positions, how much leverage is reasonable, and I was still fantasizing about triple-digit APY. As a result, a wave of pullback directly led to liquidation. This isn't a misjudgment of the direction; it's blatant suicidal configuration.
During the bull market, I could still fool myself into thinking "This is my strong operational skill," but in fact, as long as the tide lifts, anyone can make money. The real difficulty lies in the drawdown control system, which most people haven't even tried.
On-chain asset management is indeed worth paying attention to, but honestly, I'm a bit tired of those "new infrastructure" claims. The key is whether we can truly develop strategies that generate returns without relying on subsidies, or else it will just be another cyclical harvest.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 12-11 00:35
That really hits home. The configuration structure is indeed a point that most people overlook. It's so comfortable to lie back and win in a bull market that you don't realize you're actually running naked.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 12-11 00:30
Hits right in the heart. I'm that kind of person who always thinks I'm right about the direction but ends up losing out due to retracement control. The biggest lesson in these two years is—speed isn't everything; the key is how long that money can last.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 12-11 00:29
The configuration structure is really insightful, but to be honest, I heard this theory back in 2021, and then those who understand "risk management" still got liquidated. The only difference is that they got liquidated two months later than others.
After being in the crypto circle for so long, I’ve discovered a painful truth: most people don’t actually die because they’re looking in the wrong direction, but because they get caught up in the configuration structure.
Do you think you’re competing with candlesticks? Wrong. You’re actually racing against time, battling with the way funds are allocated, and engaging with how to manage risk exposure.
In a bull market, everyone is a stock god, but that’s not skill; it’s just the tide lifting you up. When a bear market hits, everyone blows up their positions collectively—not because they’re unlucky, but because the market is using the most brutal method to淘汰 unqualified players.
Those who can endure until the next cycle rely not on quick reactions to hot topics, but on understanding how to control drawdowns, maintain steady growth, and slowly build a moat through compounded profits.
It’s precisely because I’ve figured this out that my focus has long shifted from short-term surfing and chasing hot stories to a deeper, more critical track—the on-chain asset management.
In this field, there’s a project I think is worth paying attention to. It’s not just creating a new “high-yield gimmick,” but aiming to bring the mature asset management capabilities of traditional finance onto the chain, transforming them into tokenized, modular, transparent, and verifiable infrastructure. Making genuine strategies with real money become as common as utilities like water, electricity, and gas in the DeFi world.
Why is this important?
Because past DeFi, frankly, has relied on burning money to survive.
What about triple-digit APYs, liquidity mining, airdrops, token airdrops…? They look lively on the surface, but fundamentally, these aren’t strategies; they’re just means to attract traffic. Once subsidies stop and流量退去, everything’s exposed.