2025-12-11 10:21:41

Assuming 80,600 is the lowest point of this round, the rebound from this position looks more like a leading wedge pattern. In the context of the larger cycle, this is part of Wave B correction.

Following this logic, after a correction and consolidation, there should be another upward move. The major resistance above is likely around 100,000, which requires close attention.

However, one point to note: the extent of this correction should not be too exaggerated. The 83,600 level can serve as a reference line; if it breaks below, a structural reassessment may be necessary.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 12-14 10:15

The path from 80,600 to 100,000 still depends on whether 83,600 can hold, otherwise we’ll have to change the story again. --- Guiding wedge sounds good, but I’m just worried it’s another self-deceiving graphic. --- I’ve heard the B-wave correction explanation too many times; every time it hits resistance, it goes silent. --- The 100,000 mark always feels like it’s there, but the key is to see the true intention of the big picture. --- If 83,600 breaks, the entire logic has to be rebuilt from scratch. That’s why I don’t trust any predictions. --- Another wave of pump and dump, it sounds just like a line to cut the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 12-14 03:07

I've seen the bullish wedge pattern too many times. Every time, they say it'll break 10,000, but in the end, it gets hammered back down.

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 12-13 15:53

Hmm... Guiding wedge pulls 100,000 for this set. I've heard it too many times. The key is whether 83,600 can hold. If it breaks, it's game over. Wait, how come the logic of B-wave correction can be applied every time? Anyway, if it rises, it's called a wave up; if it falls, it's a wave correction. It's hilarious. Is the 100,000 level really hard? It seems like every integer in history has been hyped up as a strong barrier... If this wave of pullback truly can't hold 83,600, all previous analyses will be invalidated. At that point, I’ll have to change my stance. Why does it feel like every time the strongest support level, once actually tested, becomes weaker?

View OriginalReply0

0xTherapist

· 12-11 10:50

The guidance wedge theory is back again, always making it sound so convincing, but what happened in the end? It looks plausible, but if 83,600 is broken, I’ll just laugh. I'm really tired of B-wave corrections; can 100,000 really hold? The 80,600 low point still seems a bit uncertain right now. Wedges are wedges, but the key is whether the volume can keep up. Another reference line—how many times does this thing need to be broken? The logic is clear, but real trading is never that obedient.

View OriginalReply0

RatioHunter

· 12-11 10:40

83,600 is really the life and death line; if broken, a reshuffle is needed. The 100,000 mark seems uncertain; it depends on whether we can truly stabilize. I've heard of the guiding wedge theory, but I'm just worried about a pullback catching you off guard. B-wave correction sounds comfortable, but whether it can actually break out remains to be seen. I'm confident about the 80,600 bottom, but I'm just afraid of a false breakout smashing it again. If this wave can reach around 100,000, I would go all-in and eat upside down. Once 83,600 drops below, the previous analysis is basically invalid.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 12-11 10:30

Breaking below 80,600 sounds pretty uncertain; what if it breaks? If the 100,000 threshold really can't be crossed, B-wave correction might turn into a C-wave. What's the chance of breaking below 83,600? It feels like it's just hovering around there. The wedge breakout seems a bit difficult; I think the rebound might not be as strong as expected. It's hard to say whether the guiding wedge pattern is reliable; anyway, I don't dare to hold a heavy position.

View OriginalReply0

ContractCollector

· 12-11 10:28

Is 80,600 really the bottom? It still feels like it's not quite clear yet. I've heard the explanation of the guiding wedge pattern too many times. Can we break the 100,000 level this time? I'm a bit skeptical. If it falls below 83,600, we'll reassess. This red line still feels a bit too loose. But the B-wave logic does seem to fit. Let's keep watching.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 12-11 10:23

If 80600 can't break through, keep watching the bullish trend. Breaking 100,000 is the key level to watch closely. Are we going for another rally? The prerequisite is that 83600 must hold, or else we’ll have to redraw the line. Guiding wedge... Wave B correction... I’ve heard these phrases too many times. Let’s just see what the market says. Is 83600 really such a critical level? It feels like there's always a "key level" every time. Before hitting 100,000, every pullback made me wonder if it was the end, but it kept going. What’s different this time? Is 83600 really a defensive line? Pull back and then crush it again—that storyline is old. There are only two possibilities anyway: either up or down, depends on whether your line is correct. When will Wave B correction finally be over? I keep waiting here every day.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#BTCMarketAnalysis
111 Popularity
#HasTheMarketDipped?
114.2K Popularity
#FedRateCutPrediction
63.93K Popularity
#ETHTrendWatch
183.56K Popularity
#FHETokenExtremeVolatility
6.64K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
GT圣诞交易GT圣诞交易
MC:$3.56KHolders:2
0.01%
2
BABNBBinance
MC:$3.51KHolders:1
0.00%
3
BA2ZDoubleZero (2Z)
MC:$3.84KHolders:2
1.91%
4
OPGOpen Game Protocol
MC:$3.52KHolders:1
0.00%
5
BAOG0G (0G)
MC:$5.13KHolders:2
7.83%

Sitemap