Here's something worth calculating: if you slap on 50% tariffs, it sounds steep. But think about it this way—when your trading partner's currency is sitting 30-40% below fair value, you'd actually need tariffs between 43-67% just to neutralize that currency advantage. The math checks out: undervalued currency creates a built-in competitive edge that tariffs struggle to offset. So that 50% number? It's not arbitrary—it's threading the needle between currency manipulation and trade balance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotBot
· 3h ago
A 50% tariff sounds harsh, but after calculations, it turns out we're still being exploited... A 30-40% depreciation in coin value requires a 43-67% increase to break even. There's something behind these numbers.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinated
· 7h ago
Wait a minute, isn't the logic reversed... Currency devaluation itself is a price war, and adding tariffs is just finishing the job?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropNinja
· 9h ago
Damn, when you do the math, it really is that harsh, otherwise it's just giving it away for free.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 12-12 06:19
Oh my goodness, once I saw the math, I realized that a 50% tariff isn't actually excessive. Essentially, it's just hedging against currency manipulation.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 12-11 11:46
Oh my, I only realized when I matched the math that the set of devaluing the exchange rate indeed bypassed the tariffs.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 12-11 11:40
This math is all theoretical, but in reality... can it really be implemented effectively?
View OriginalReply0
FadCatcher
· 12-11 11:31
Wait a minute, this logic doesn't seem to have any issues... We've seen plenty of schemes to devalue the coin in the crypto world, and now it's all about trade wars, right?
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 12-11 11:31
Bro, your math calculations are really tough. Lowering the coin value is indeed a brilliant move.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 12-11 11:30
Damn, once you understand the math, it's not that intimidating anymore.
Here's something worth calculating: if you slap on 50% tariffs, it sounds steep. But think about it this way—when your trading partner's currency is sitting 30-40% below fair value, you'd actually need tariffs between 43-67% just to neutralize that currency advantage. The math checks out: undervalued currency creates a built-in competitive edge that tariffs struggle to offset. So that 50% number? It's not arbitrary—it's threading the needle between currency manipulation and trade balance.