2025-12-11 23:24:56

The Warren vs Luna CBDC debate is heating up. Luna's pushing for a permanent ban on central bank digital currencies, questioning whether it's really about protecting citizens. Meanwhile, Warren's crypto stance continues drawing criticism from the industry. The forever ban proposal is gaining traction among those worried about government overreach in digital finance. This regulatory battle shows how divided Washington remains on crypto policy.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlindBoxVictim

· 19h ago

It's the same old script again, Warren and Luna are arguing, and we retail investors are once again going to be cannon fodder...

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 12-13 22:03

The consultation records show that the clinical manifestation of this debate is very typical—policy-level complications. Luna advocates for a permanent ban, while Warren坚持现有框架, both sides are using the excuse of "protecting citizens" to treat conditions they can't see clearly. It is recommended that Washington regularly reviews its liquidity indicators, rather than just expressing positions, and first ask where the real risk alerts of CBDC are.

View OriginalReply0

WalletInspector

· 12-13 09:38

Nah, this permanent ban proposal is outrageous. The government's true intention to monitor digital assets has been fully exposed.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainArchaeologist

· 12-11 23:55

Permanent ban? That sounds pretty radical, but the question is, who says government digital currencies are necessarily a bad thing... Warren's logic can be absurd at times, but Luna hasn't really thought through this stance either.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 12-11 23:51

ngl Warren's way of speaking is really old school now; Luna might as well go ahead with a permanent ban. I actually find this approach satisfying... just feel like Washington can never figure out what it really wants.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 12-11 23:47

Damn, Luna is playing with fire. A permanent ban is simply not feasible...

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 12-11 23:42

It's the same old trick from Warren again... Do you really think we're all fools?

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusBot

· 12-11 23:41

Permanent ban? Ha, it's that big government trick again, do they really think we're all fools?

View OriginalReply0

RegenRestorer

· 12-11 23:28

What is the use of a permanent ban? If the government wants to control, they still have to control... Instead of banning, it's better to find a balance.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#FedRateCutComing
696.61K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
69.95K Popularity
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
24.33K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
19.8K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
512.05K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
WoLFWolf Coin
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.09%
2
14332231433223
MC:$3.63KHolders:2
0.12%
3
SoSoSoSo
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.00%
4
GugeAICNGugeAI.cn
MC:$3.59KHolders:1
0.00%
5
EOSEOS
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.08%

Sitemap