The new administration's playbook seems to prioritize sanctions above everything else. Take the recent Venezuelan tanker seizure—it reads like another episode crafted for maximum drama, but what's the actual endgame here?
Sure, invoking the Monroe Doctrine sounds bold on paper. But where's the strategic victory? Disrupting shadow fleets might make headlines, yet it doesn't answer the fundamental question: what comes next? Energy markets hate uncertainty, and traders are already pricing in the chaos.
Maybe I'm missing something, but this feels more reactive than calculated. When policy becomes theater, markets—and the people depending on stable oil flows—pay the price. Is there a coherent plan, or are we just watching improvisation in real-time?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 12-15 00:15
It's that same set of sanctions again, really like a play... The energy markets are all confused.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTrapper
· 12-14 12:34
lmao "invoking the monroe doctrine" in 2025... actually if you read the contract on these sanctions regimes, it's just textbook theater designed to pump the headlines. shadow fleets keep moving regardless, energy markets pricing in chaos like it's clockwork. called this exact pattern months ago tbh
Reply0
RugpullTherapist
· 12-14 05:13
The policy has turned into a theatrical performance, and the energy market is in chaos. Who can handle this?
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 12-12 04:03
It's the same old trick again, sanctions, sanctions, sanctions... Do they really treat geopolitics as a grand theatrical performance?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92
· 12-12 04:02
Policies have turned into a theatrical performance, with the market and ordinary people footing the bill... How long can this routine last?
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 12-12 04:02
ngl this reads like watching MEV extraction but for geopolitics—pure chaos theater masquerading as strategy. shadow fleets getting seized is just surface-level noise, the real price deviation's happening in energy futures rn and nobody's mapping the cross-chain correlation properly
Reply0
BottomMisser
· 12-12 04:00
Haha, another big policy show, really treating the energy market as a stage
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 12-12 03:39
Another show of sanctions, basically a policy stunt, and we still have to pay the bill.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 12-12 03:36
It's the same old trick again, sanctions and sanctions all day long. I really can't understand what's going on inside these people's heads.
The new administration's playbook seems to prioritize sanctions above everything else. Take the recent Venezuelan tanker seizure—it reads like another episode crafted for maximum drama, but what's the actual endgame here?
Sure, invoking the Monroe Doctrine sounds bold on paper. But where's the strategic victory? Disrupting shadow fleets might make headlines, yet it doesn't answer the fundamental question: what comes next? Energy markets hate uncertainty, and traders are already pricing in the chaos.
Maybe I'm missing something, but this feels more reactive than calculated. When policy becomes theater, markets—and the people depending on stable oil flows—pay the price. Is there a coherent plan, or are we just watching improvisation in real-time?