When facing depositions from major creditors, a bankrupt startup in the Web3 space chose to invoke the Fifth Amendment rather than cooperate. The move came amid an ongoing federal criminal investigation into the company's operations. It's a stark reminder of the legal minefields that can await even well-funded ventures—especially in industries where regulatory scrutiny runs high. The silence strategy raises questions: What's serious enough to warrant such defensive tactics? Is it operational misconduct, financial mismanagement, or something deeper? For investors tracking this space, it underscores why due diligence on management credibility matters just as much as the technology itself.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicatorvip
· 8h ago
Silence is the best answer; this matter is basically confirmed.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperervip
· 8h ago
Silence is a confession; this trick is really nothing new in Web3.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYearsvip
· 9h ago
Silence is the answer, this move directly exposed it
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoatvip
· 9h ago
Silence is a confession; I've seen this tactic too many times in the blockchain community.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetectivevip
· 9h ago
Silent and speechless... with this move, it's basically a dead giveaway.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlItvip
· 9h ago
Silence itself is the biggest acknowledgment; this move is truly outstanding.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)