The real roadblock holding back a potential $10 trillion shift in how we handle RWA, bonds, government treasuries, and financial infrastructure isn't technology—it's compliance frameworks. Right now, the gatekeeping factor preventing tokenizable assets like real estate, fine art, and institutional portfolios from landing onchain is regulatory uncertainty. Same story with government bodies exploring blockchain adoption into core banking rails. Honestly though, the upside is massive once this gets sorted. The potential use cases alone span everything from fractionalizing premium assets to modernizing how we settle securities. It's not that we lack the technical capacity to execute this—we've got the infrastructure. What's missing is the policy clarity that would unlock institutional capital and government participation at scale.

RWA-1,8%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanAccountvip
· 01-08 21:11
Honestly, regulation is the real bottleneck; the technology has been ready for a long time...
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 01-08 17:36
Basically, we're just missing a document, right? We've had the technology for a long time, but the bottleneck is all the regulatory stuff...
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMinervip
· 01-07 22:55
Basically, it's still regulation holding things back, not a technical issue.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapistvip
· 01-06 09:23
In plain terms, if the regulatory hurdle isn't cleared, even the most advanced technology is useless.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 01-05 23:58
Basically, it's just waiting for policies to break through. The technology has been ready for a long time; the key is for regulations to open up. Who wouldn't be tempted by a cake worth 10 trillion?
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 01-05 23:57
ngl, regulatory clarity being the bottleneck is statistically accurate but like... people have been saying this for 5+ years? let me pull up my spreadsheet on how many regulatory frameworks actually materialized vs. hype cycles. spoiler: data suggests otherwise on the timeline here tbh
Reply0
GasFeeVictimvip
· 01-05 23:57
Basically, it's just waiting for the policy to loosen up. The technology has been ready for a long time; now we're just missing the regulatory hurdle.
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemistvip
· 01-05 23:56
nah this is just cope. regulators will drag this out forever while we sit here watching inefficiency vectors get wider. the tech was never the bottleneck—it's political calculus. they don't want disintermediation happening this fast.
Reply0
SchrodingersPapervip
· 01-05 23:50
The compliance framework is bottlenecked; in plain terms, it's waiting for policy dividends to be implemented. Once that happens, the influx of institutional funds will be the real starting point.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-05 23:36
In plain terms, it's just regulatory bottlenecks; the technology has been ready for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt