Recently spent some time looking into the Walrus project and gained some new insights into the decentralized storage and content distribution track. To be honest, projects in this space often fall into the trap of storytelling, but only those that build solid infrastructure will truly survive.
My evaluation criteria are quite simple, based on these three points:
**Upload and retrieval experience**. Can users smoothly store data and quickly retrieve it when needed? This is the most direct feeling. No matter how advanced the technology is, if the system is laggy or unstable, everything is meaningless.
**Sustainability of the cost structure**. Storage is inherently a heavy-capital business. Whether operational costs can be controlled long-term and whether the fee model is reasonable determine how far the project can go. Burning money for subsidies is ultimately not a solution.
**Presence of real applications in the ecosystem**. This is the most telling indicator. For example, media platforms storing resources, game developers using it for game assets, AI teams using it for datasets, or on-chain applications doing content hosting—these are the hard metrics.
In these three dimensions, where will Walrus's core competitiveness ultimately manifest? I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
27 Likes
Reward
27
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PuzzledScholar
· 01-11 12:41
Honestly, it still comes down to real user experience; telling stories is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 01-11 12:18
Honestly, the last one is the most obvious fake. Real users vote with their feet, no matter how much hype there is, it doesn't matter.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-09 07:19
To be honest, there are too many storytelling projects, but very few are truly implemented.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 01-08 21:50
It all depends on whether the ecosystem has actual users running on it. Speed and low fees are all superficial.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-08 21:50
In plain terms, the storage track is all about who can make the fee model more attractive. Whether Walrus's approach can truly reduce costs depends on the data.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 01-08 21:50
The good words in the first sentence are all spoken, but the key still depends on whether we can survive the bear market.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 01-08 21:50
That's very true; there are too many stories being told, and only a few are truly useful.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 01-08 21:47
The first metric is the most critical; being slow means death.
If the storage product lags, no one will use it regardless of how cheap it is, and Walrus needs to prove this.
Can costs be reduced? It seems difficult, given the heavy asset burden.
Ecosystem applications are the key; if no one uses them, it's all pointless.
Let's wait and see if the Sui ecosystem will truly drive traffic to it.
Recently spent some time looking into the Walrus project and gained some new insights into the decentralized storage and content distribution track. To be honest, projects in this space often fall into the trap of storytelling, but only those that build solid infrastructure will truly survive.
My evaluation criteria are quite simple, based on these three points:
**Upload and retrieval experience**. Can users smoothly store data and quickly retrieve it when needed? This is the most direct feeling. No matter how advanced the technology is, if the system is laggy or unstable, everything is meaningless.
**Sustainability of the cost structure**. Storage is inherently a heavy-capital business. Whether operational costs can be controlled long-term and whether the fee model is reasonable determine how far the project can go. Burning money for subsidies is ultimately not a solution.
**Presence of real applications in the ecosystem**. This is the most telling indicator. For example, media platforms storing resources, game developers using it for game assets, AI teams using it for datasets, or on-chain applications doing content hosting—these are the hard metrics.
In these three dimensions, where will Walrus's core competitiveness ultimately manifest? I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts.