A recent study shows that approximately 2.3 million to 3.7 million Bitcoins have been permanently lost worldwide, accounting for 11% to 18% of the maximum supply of 21 million coins. According to Ledger’s 2025 report, these Bitcoins mainly disappeared due to holders losing private keys, passing away without transferring access rights, or early wallets being unrecoverable, effectively removing them from circulation.
Unlike fiat currencies, which can be continuously issued, the total supply of Bitcoin is encoded in the protocol. When these tokens are permanently “lost,” the available supply in the market shrinks accordingly. Several on-chain data providers, including Glassnode, point out in their economic models that when supply decreases while demand remains stable or even grows, the price center tends to be pushed higher. “Every Bitcoin that can no longer be used makes the remaining circulating assets more valuable,” said an analyst.
It is important to note that the loss figures are estimates, not precise statistics. Researchers typically determine the potential scale of loss by tracking wallets that have not made any transfers for years and are in deep dormancy. While it cannot be verified that every lost Bitcoin is truly unrecoverable, even at the lowest estimate, the reduction in available supply is already quite significant.
This discovery has sparked widespread discussion within the community. Supporters believe that lost Bitcoins are equivalent to “permanent destruction,” which further reinforces their scarcity attributes, thus reaffirming the logic of Bitcoin as “digital gold.” Some also caution that scarcity is not the only factor driving price increases; macroeconomic conditions, market sentiment, and capital flows can also have profound impacts.
In the long term, the permanent loss of Bitcoins, combined with the halving mechanism, amplifies the network’s deflationary characteristics. Analysts suggest that this structural contraction could gradually alter market perceptions of Bitcoin’s true circulating supply and may become a key variable in future valuation models. For investors focused on Bitcoin’s long-term value, this trend is likely to continue influencing market dynamics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Millions of Bitcoins Permanently Disappear? Actual Circulating Supply Suddenly Drops, Increasing BTC Scarcity
A recent study shows that approximately 2.3 million to 3.7 million Bitcoins have been permanently lost worldwide, accounting for 11% to 18% of the maximum supply of 21 million coins. According to Ledger’s 2025 report, these Bitcoins mainly disappeared due to holders losing private keys, passing away without transferring access rights, or early wallets being unrecoverable, effectively removing them from circulation.
Unlike fiat currencies, which can be continuously issued, the total supply of Bitcoin is encoded in the protocol. When these tokens are permanently “lost,” the available supply in the market shrinks accordingly. Several on-chain data providers, including Glassnode, point out in their economic models that when supply decreases while demand remains stable or even grows, the price center tends to be pushed higher. “Every Bitcoin that can no longer be used makes the remaining circulating assets more valuable,” said an analyst.
It is important to note that the loss figures are estimates, not precise statistics. Researchers typically determine the potential scale of loss by tracking wallets that have not made any transfers for years and are in deep dormancy. While it cannot be verified that every lost Bitcoin is truly unrecoverable, even at the lowest estimate, the reduction in available supply is already quite significant.
This discovery has sparked widespread discussion within the community. Supporters believe that lost Bitcoins are equivalent to “permanent destruction,” which further reinforces their scarcity attributes, thus reaffirming the logic of Bitcoin as “digital gold.” Some also caution that scarcity is not the only factor driving price increases; macroeconomic conditions, market sentiment, and capital flows can also have profound impacts.
In the long term, the permanent loss of Bitcoins, combined with the halving mechanism, amplifies the network’s deflationary characteristics. Analysts suggest that this structural contraction could gradually alter market perceptions of Bitcoin’s true circulating supply and may become a key variable in future valuation models. For investors focused on Bitcoin’s long-term value, this trend is likely to continue influencing market dynamics.