In the past two days, the group has been sharing screenshots about stablecoin regulation, reserve audits, and "de-pegging" concerns. Seeing these repeatedly has actually made me a bit numb... I usually don't follow the crowd emotionally; I have a habit: I first check the project's GitHub and the most recent audit report, even if just to get a general idea.

To put it simply, if a newcomer wants to judge "credibility," I think focusing on three things is enough: whether GitHub has long-term maintenance (not just a sudden flurry of commits), whether the audit report clearly states the scope and what it doesn't cover (saying "pass" alone is basically useless), and whether upgrade permissions are multi-signed, who signs them, and if there's a delay (being able to change rules with one click is crucial). These things don't guarantee safety, but they can help filter out "rumors" from your mind. Anyway, I decide whether to get involved after checking these—taking it slow is actually pretty good.