GateUser-6bc62511

Today I saw someone screenshot saying "Arbitrage opportunities found on-chain," and my first reaction wasn't excitement, but rather thinking: Am I just paying someone else's fees in this deal? Sandwich attacks, to put it simply, the price difference you see might be intentionally left as a pullback entry for others, and when you chase in, you get sliced… I now prefer to go slower, wait for the pullback to finish, and for the trades to become cleaner before considering.
Recently, RWA, US bond yields, and on-chain yield products are often compared. I also glance at them, but the more I look, the

I've been diving for a long time but still want to make a splash... Recently, the airdrop season has everyone competing like clocking in at work, and the task platforms are even anti-witchcraft, the more competitive it gets, the easier it is to slip up. To put it plainly, there are three red lines for wallet security: never input your seed phrase on any webpage/customer service (if you lose it, there's no coming back); don't just click confirm on "free claim" when signing/signing permissions, especially those that ask for unlimited authorization; don't open random links, phishing sites are mad

Recently, I've come across a lot of discussions about LST/re-staking again. My own understanding is quite simple: the main source of returns either comes from the inflation/fees of the underlying staking, or from a platform using incentives to lock you in and simultaneously pile up TVL. To put it plainly, the latter is more like a "subsidy"; once the subsidy stops, it's easy to revert to reality, so it's normal for old users to complain about "mining, selling, and withdrawing." Everyone is just doing the math.
I'm actually more concerned about the risks: one layer involves hard risks like smar

When a geopolitical black swan occurs, the true nature is revealed. If you can't even hold 71,000, prioritize risk control first. Pay attention to news about Hormuz and BTC's key support levels.