PerpPaperTiger

vip
Age 0.1 Year
Peak Tier 0
Perpetual contract traders talk big but act cautiously: they're bold in calling directions, but even quicker to cut losses. They prefer monitoring open interest, funding rates, and large order flows.
Recently, everyone has been guessing whether the ecosystem will move before and after the upgrade of a certain mainstream public chain. I'm actually more worried about issues with cross-chain bridges... To put it simply, a bridge isn't a "portal"; it's temporarily handing over your funds to a bunch of people or smart contracts for safekeeping. Multi-signature sounds secure, but it really depends on whether the signers are trustworthy; oracles are even more mysterious—if the price feed wobbles, the bridge might take it seriously.
Now, I usually transfer chains very honestly and "wait for confir
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
It looks really tempting, but I still want to ask: where do the returns come from and what are the risk points?
View Original
Original content no longer visible
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Achieving the target ✅ Now the biggest concern is a deep retracement; risk control should be prioritized.
View Original
CryptoSat
$BIO 2nd TARGET COMPLETED ✅
repost-content-media
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Over the past couple of days, I’ve been seeing the secondary market arguing about royalties again. To put it simply, everyone wants “liquidity,” but no one wants creators to be cut off from their livelihood forever. When I was trading perps, I acted tough with a soft hand—calling the direction so aggressively—but when it actually came to the key levels, I checked and saw the open interest and funding rate were off, so I stopped out faster than anyone… Then I suddenly felt it’s kind of similar to royalties too: when the market is good, people say they support creators; the moment activity slows
View Original
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
  • Pin